Micro:bits & Robots – a winning combination

Every afternoon after a regular school day, a group of girls from inner city schools come to Roedean School (SA) to take lessons in Maths, Science and English. In the winter term I take a group of grade 10s for coding & robotics classes. We use the micro:bit chip, which has a handy online platform for programming the chip at None of the students have had any prior experience of coding or robotics,

After an initial lesson on the platform and learning about how to use the blocks together with event handlers, I introduced the robots (in this case Maqueens from DFRobot). We went over some code for getting a robot to move forward using the PRIMM method to predict, test and modify the code to get the code to work. Stduents were working in groups of two or three. Each group had a chip and robot to use to test the code they wrote. When a group could make the robot move forward for a length of time, I asked them to make the robot turn 90 degrees and move forward again.

Because making a turn relies on tinkering with motor speed and duration of the move, this is no easy task and requires repeated attempts. Soon the room was full of groups either modifying their code or shouting in excitement as the robot’s movements got closer and closer to the desired result. After the initial input I spent most of my time moving from group to group encouraging them to try again, reminding them to switch off batteries between tries and making the ocassional suggestion where students got stuck.

I have seldom seen high school girls quite so excited about anything. Of all the different combinations of platforms and robots I have tried, the simplicity of the micro:bit platform paired with a suitable robot seems to work best for this type of task. In the past I have found that girls tend to shy away from failure, and tinkering with speed/time settings does not usually sit well with them. There are repeated failures before an appropriate combination is reached. An essential part of developing a tinkering disposition is to accept the frustration of repeated near misses. I have seen classes start to loose interest if the process of modifying and testing is too onerous. The micro:bit platform allows one to pair a chip with a computer using a USB cable and then all one needs to do is click on the download button to update the code on the chip. I leave the USB cable on the chip so it curls in the air like a rat’s tail. This allows a very quick turn-around time and if combined with a bit of a competitive edge, encourages a sense of urgency!

It seems to me that whatever coding and robotics platforms you choose it really needs to be as effortless as possible. The sweat should be in the coding, not in flashing the chip. It also helps to have as many robots and chips as you can available to make sure no-one has to wait for a chance to test their code.

By the way, this post has not been paid for by the micro:bit organisation. This is genuine, and unremunerated enthusiasm on my part!


Talking to Phil Bagge

I talk to Phil Bagge, Computing Inspector/advisor HIAS, CAS Master Teacher, speaker, trainer, author of free resources & 2 books. We talk about teaching computing, particularly in the primary school.


Talking to Jeanette Viljoen

In this week’s episode I talk to Jeanette Viljoen, HOD ICTs and Technology at Roedean Junior School in Johannesburg, South Africa about teaching ICTs in the junior school.

Leave a comment

Posted by on April 21, 2022 in Interviews


Lesson Planning – Using the Semantic Plane

Lesson planning is not something anyone enjoys, and I am not a fan of overloading teachers with mindless bureaucracy. The best teachers I know never write anything down. A teacher who sticks to a plan rather than rolls with the punches frightens me somewhat. You cannot forge ahead and teach the iambic pentameter if you realise that the class does not understand what a syllable is. You have to change course and teach the syllable first – surely? Plans are made to be changed. But a teacher does need to have a plan.

That plan needs to include a roadmap of where you want your students to go. Clearly the biggest component of any planning is about the major concepts and skills you want students to acquire, but frequently teachers are asked to map their lesson planning to Bloom’s taxonomy to ensure that higher order thinking is sufficiently represented. I find this somewhat hit and miss. Frankly it has never made much sense to me. Understanding does not seem to me to be a lower order thinking skill. To comprehend one needs to synthesise and analyse. Similarly, why is knowledge lower order? Knowledge is not just recall, but requires comprehension and evaluation. Mapping to Bloom’s is always a bit of a thumb-suck.

It seems to me that if you want to ensure higher order thinking is taking place, you are really wanting to move your students from the kinds of everyday understandings of the world they bring to class, largely simple and concrete, towards a more academic undertsanding, more abstract and complex constituting the target knoweldge of any discipline. Karl Maton (2014) has written extensively about the semantic plane and how crucial it is to consider semantic gravity (contextualized or abstract) and semantic density (simple or complex). I find it useful to draw on Maton’s semantic plane to plan this aspect of any unit of work. Mapping each task I set students to a cartesian plane with 4 quadrants (simple & concrete, complex & concrete, simple & abstract, complex & abstract) allows me to get a quick sense of the journey I am taking students on and ensures that I am not operating just in one mode. Generally speaking it is making those movements, what Maton calls tours, that is important for building understanding. Movement is what makes for good teaching and good learning. Abstract and complex ideas need to be broken down, made concrete, made simple for students to understand. Likewise, students need to take their understandings and learn to reformulate them in more complex and abstract academic discourse. As a teacher, if all your tasks are stuck in one quadrant, you are probably not helping students make these vital tours. Your lessons may be too abstract and dry or too framed in the here and now, in which case what are you actually learning?

I know that all of this is going to be received with a measure of scepticism. One more thing to do for what gain? The gain for me is very real though. Each activity I set tends to have a main teaching point in mind, and as I plan these tasks and assignments, mapping it to the semantic plane helps me identify the main point and get a sense of how to approach teaching it. For example, in the slide above, part of a module on Office applications in my ICTs class I set two Excel spreadsheet tasks: one a budget, the other an interactive quiz created by students using formulae to be self marking with an automated scoreboard. In the budget task I introduced the idea of some of the formulae and functions students would need for the quiz project. I classified the budget as an abstract/complex task because I wanted students to realise that functions such as the autosum can be used in many different spreadsheets. I tried to teach it as an abstraction that could then be applied by students in their own spreadsheets. In the quiz task I did not re-teach the autosum, I simply asked students what function they already knew they could apply to create a scoreboard. I was asking them to recontextualize their existing knowledge and planning it on the semantic plane was for me a short-hand method for planning my pedagogical approach. Similarly the quiz project requires the conditional function for judging if an answer is right or wrong. My concern when teaching this was to teach students to identify which functions could be used for any purpose, a movement from abstract to contextual. By thinking through in their heads what they want the computer to do, I wanted students to listen for key words (eg. IF) to help identify which function could be used. The major movement is thus consistently from abstract to concrete, but with simultaneous levels of complexity.

To my mind the semantic plane offers a much more reliable measure of critical thinking than Bloom’s taxonomy and presents a visual representation of planning for any unit of work.


Maton, K. (2014) Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge


Talking to Bea Toniolo

Bea and I talk about teaching second and foreign languages, the role of grammar teaching and teaching languages online.


Talking to Dylan Langheim

In this podcast I talk to Dylan Langheim, edTech innovator at Oakhill. We discuss technology in education and lessons learned from the Great Onlining.


Computer Science was always supposed to be taught to everyone, and it wasn’t about getting a job: A historical perspective

Computing Ed Research - Guzdial's Take

I gave four keynote talks in the last two months, at SIGITE, Models 2021 Educators’ Symposium, VL/HCC, and CSERC. I’m honored to be invited to them, but I do suspect that four keynotes in six weeks suggest some “personal issues” in planning and saying “No.” Some of these were recorded, but I don’t believe than any of them are publicly available

The keynotes had a similar structure and themes. (A lot easier than four completely different keynotes!) My activities in computing education these days are organized around two main projects:

My goal was to put both of these efforts in a historical context. My argument is that computer science…

View original post 1,439 more words

Leave a comment

Posted by on November 29, 2021 in Uncategorized


Talking to William Lau

We talk about Computer Science education generally and pedagogy in particular.

Leave a comment

Posted by on November 24, 2021 in Interviews


Talking To Colin Webster

eSports is perhaps the fstaest growing sport in the world. Computer gaming has entered the mainstream and draws huge audiences and a great deal of money. And yet it has not gained wide traction in schools. Colin and I discuss the reasons for this.

Leave a comment

Posted by on November 10, 2021 in Interviews


Talking with Marj Brown

In this episode I talk to Marj Brown who is Head of the History Department at Roedean School in Johannesburg, South Africa. Marj is a UNESCO Sustainable Development Goals ambassador, has run literacy projects and has a finger in just about every pie. We talk about the place of History in the curriculum and about the many projects she is involved in.

Leave a comment

Posted by on November 4, 2021 in Interviews

%d bloggers like this: